DVDDECRYPTER UPDATE PLEASE READ

[zarish]

I believe I understand why renaming files won't work -- I may be wrong or have improper understanding, please correct me if I do:

v3.1.7.0 and earlier break VTS_01 and beyond down with naming that identifies MENU class items seperately when ripped in file mode with a split of CellId. It does not however identify or seperate out MENU class cells for VIDEO_TS.

v3.1.8.0 and higher appear to also seperate out the MENU class items when ripped in file mode with a split of CELLID for the VIDEO_TS.

Thus renaming might work if all the files fit into menu class or not as identified in the IFO and also appeared in the order that v3.1.7.0 and earlier would have listed them, but this is highly unlikely and would almost definately not work if the cells were mixed types. One would have to go through the IFO and check. A lot of time and manual work that is best left to tools.

This whole post is just my best guess based on observations of running both version of DVDDecrypter on a few discs with settings I believe are accurately reproducing the results required by DVDStripper.

 

[woody]

The admins of this forum stand solidly behind Mackemx,and TheMadGuy.

It is unfortunate that an update in Dvd Decrypter has caused problems with DvdStripper.There was no way of knowing it's effect on their product.

I can tell you that they stand behind their product like no other software I've seen.They gave everyone a temporary solution until they can impliment a fix.These guys are dedicated,but have regular jobs,and lives.Still the upgrades continue.

We have promoted other software,but dropped it because of lack of support from the developers.The dedication,and support with DvdStripper is superb.They will continue to have our backing.

The spirit of this forum is to approach problems in a friendly adult manner.I wish to see that continue.Infighting and insulting are not received well here.

So please continue to post in a pleasant manner everyone.Thanks for feedback,good or bad.Every effort will be made to resolve issues with the software,but you must remain patient.

 

[The-poacher]

@woody ditto

I bought & use this S/ware sometimes.
I think its great & if U consider the guys behind it are doing it in their sparetime then they have my tnx & admiration.They will I know persevere & the proggy will only improve.
They want & accept input,criticism & suggestions but just because someone reckons the program should do so & so dosent mean they will implement it (now or ever).They know the limitations of the proggy but are improving it as I post.But at the end of the day it is their S/ware & they are the ones who eventually decide what to add to it.
Some of U are experts @ ripping,stripping,editing etc movies.Most of us are noobs (or in my case to old too learn) & this s/ware lets us do things to movie backups that we only dreamed of.

mackem & TMG deserve our tnx & appreciation for a great & cheap proggy.

 

[SirQUK]

Zarish i apologise if i sounded a bit sharp with you, but it did seem you where complaining without fully reading about how to use DS! ( something we are getting used to with a lot of ppl that buy this software :S)
Now you understand how to use it, perhaps you do not think it is so bad?
I have spent many 100s (yes 100s ) of hours testing DS and i know its faults more than most, but its being resolved as we speak
I dont think that any "dependant " software needs to be upgraded if the version that works is ok?!?!?!
What makes 3.1.9.0 any better for DS? i found no reason to change my version yet, but im sure MackemX and TMG will indeed introduce compatiability with 3.1.9.0 or find another way around it perhaps ? - who knows.

 

[jaapf]

Bit of a useless discussion.
The way I see it, DS has NO problems at all running on systems that confirm to de requirements is states. That means: IFOEDIT 0.95 and Decrypter 3.1.7.0. If anyone decides he wants an update for Decrypter he knows he might have a problem with DS.

Actually it's more a problem wich is due to Decrypter: They decided to rewrite there strategie, so abandoning backwards compatibility.

It's a big bonus the DS team is working on a solution. They could easaly have stated: keep Decrypter 3.1.7.0 (packing it with DS) 'cause that's what the program uses (an as-is aproach).

Keep up the good work guys

 

[MackemX]

Bit of a useless discussion.
The way I see it, DS has NO problems at all running on systems that confirm to de requirements is states. That means: IFOEDIT 0.95 and Decrypter 3.1.7.0. If anyone decides he wants an update for Decrypter he knows he might have a problem with DS.

Actually it's more a problem wich is due to Decrypter: They decided to rewrite there strategie, so abandoning backwards compatibility.

It's a big bonus the DS team is working on a solution. They could easaly have stated: keep Decrypter 3.1.7.0 (packing it with DS) 'cause that's what the program uses (an as-is aproach).

Keep up the good work guys

thanks for looking on the positive side jaapf

the DVDDecrypter issue is now confirmed as being fixed and we are still tying up a few loose ends before releasing 021 version

so hang in there people

 

[Jan-Erik]

Aaah

Waisted a few nights on this problem - but I wqill be downgradign soon, then let's see what happens.

Cheers

/Jan-Erik

 

[egrave]

Error Message

What is RCE I am trying to Rip a DVD and I get a error on file 24 and it says a possible RCE protection.