defragging and burning, weird as it is, does represent an extreme pass/fail test for the system, doesn't it?
didn't you mention a system scan among the many other process you were running while burning a disc? for the record, my temp is on my c:\ drive, and that's where most burning apps cache the files. i've tried it with RNM, both on my T1300 Thinkpad and my P4 desktop -- not even a hiccup. defrag prog in these cases was NOT the Microsoft-supplied one, but O&O. It's worked for me. Try it -- use rewritables, though, for testing.
Wrong on all 4 thoughts? Let's take it from last to first...
4 - if you worked for either one, we wouldn't be discussing these now, would we?
3 - of course you know what a coaster is...
2 - ...you have a collection...aha, you admit it, at least...but with other burning software, yeah, sure...thought you've only used nero?
1 - ...let me correct that.. make it pre-1997, when Burn-Proof was unheard of, and a 1MB buffer was a cool thing to have.
Again, I will state it, and I am not here to belittle your affirmations regarding Nero, nor to start a pissing match. My first experience with Nero was not a happy one, and experience will teach one to be careful the next time around. Same reason why I gave up on Sony writers last month, I had to return 3 -- yes, 3 -- writers to the dealer within 1 week, all under warranty -- bad batch shipment.
If Nero works best for you, then best of luck 2 ya. In my opinion, though, multi-burning on 2 drives and hovering at about 25% of my system's resources (which nero does) is a wee bit too much. Check resource levels with RNM and compare them with Nero.
Name one thing Nero does that RNM can't.
