Drive letter missing

i know i mentioned it before but do u have the jumpers set rite on the hard drives, the 20 gig to the master and the 40 as the slave?
 
What the heck is that OS "windows 98ME"? Mixed mode? :p
You should get some disk partitioner (Partition magic, System Commander, Acronis or whatever you like) to access the drive at boottime, and either change the cluster size to 16K or convert it to NTFS. Your XP OS should be able to mount it under a letter.
 

Bill Davies

New member
Johnny? said:
i know i mentioned it before but do u have the jumpers set rite on the hard drives, the 20 gig to the master and the 40 as the slave?
gday Johnny yes the jumpers are set ok and are showing in the d/manager ,and in the xp managers even tells me what space i have left on the missing drive, thanx
 

Bill Davies

New member
Johnny? said:
i know i mentioned it before but do u have the jumpers set rite on the hard drives, the 20 gig to the master and the 40 as the slave?
gday all many thanx for your help i now have , 2nd hard drive back by trying all your ideas i was able to get a drive letter to work,your a great bunch of guys and i hope the furum go's on fror ever
again many thanx .
 
Bill Davies said:
gday all many thanx for your help i now have , 2nd hard drive back by trying all your ideas i was able to get a drive letter to work,your a great bunch of guys and i hope the furum go's on fror ever
again many thanx .

So what exactly was it that fixed your problem?
 
Right Click MY Computer icon on desktop ... and the go Manage...then go Disk Management .. now does it show up there ?
 
scarecrow said:
What the heck is that OS "windows 98ME"? Mixed mode? :p
You should get some disk partitioner (Partition magic, System Commander, Acronis or whatever you like) to access the drive at boottime, and either change the cluster size to 16K or convert it to NTFS. Your XP OS should be able to mount it under a letter.
Excuse me for butting in but Windows Millenium (ME) uses FAT32X,although it can run on previously formatted ordinary FAT32 disks.And it can`t use NTFS..Installing it on a bare clean drive it`ll always format it in FAT32X!
 
Last edited:

Bill Davies

New member
Nunyobiznes said:
So what exactly was it that fixed your problem?
gday i fixed the drive letter by changing the drive to dyamic and it let me give it a letter alls well and i now have my stuff all back
again thanx for all your help agreat forum indeed keep up the great work you fella's do to help peole.
 
plextorman said:
Excuse me for butting in but Windows Millenium (ME) uses FAT32X,although it can run on previously formatted ordinary FAT32 disks.And it can`t use NTFS..Installing it on a bare clean drive it`ll always format it in FAT32X!
Did you care to read how this thread has started?
...gday can you help me i installed xp pro on a formatted drive C:... :rolleyes:
 
WOODY - It's getting ugly in here with all these BOLD and highlighted words being thrown about. Close this thread before it spirals out of control. :D :D :D
 
Where have you been smart-ass?

Sounds like a personal attack to me which goes against forum rules.Scarecrow can handle himself quite well, here,and other places.You never know where you may find him.

I'll see where the thread goes. ;)
 
scarecrow said:
Did you care to read how this thread has started?
...gday can you help me i installed xp pro on a formatted drive C:... :rolleyes:
Yeah,of course I did! But he didn`t explain that he`d formatted his C drive with FAT32 then installing XP on it,with his 'missing' drive supposedly sporting WinME with either FAT32 (which he COULD read from XP),or FAT32X if it`s a `clean` Me install (which he could STILL read from his C: drive) Now we know NTFS 2 FAT is readable-FAT 2 NTFS not (unless by something like READNTFS or similar program).But we all know he didn`t have NTFS on his missing drive as Me doesn`t support it.It does however support a strange hybrid called FAT32X (M$ experimenting again).You were probably correct in your earlier post about the "non conventional cluster size" FAT32X is most certainly that..It can`t be read from DOS 6.22 or earlier!So that theory was out..Does that answer your question? I was just making a statement,that`s all.....:)
 
Last edited:
Nunyobiznes: I just learned how to bold out phrases just recently, sorry about that... :p
Plextorman: right, but since our friend IS using XP currently, his problem shouldn't be inability to access NTFS or FAT(32) volumes. Nonconventional cluster size sounds like the most convenient explanation.
 
scarecrow said:
Nunyobiznes: I just learned how to bold out phrases just recently, sorry about that... :p
Plextorman: right, but since our friend IS using XP currently, his problem shouldn't be inability to access NTFS or FAT(32) volumes. Nonconventional cluster size sounds like the most convenient explanation.
Yup,you may be right....
 
scarecrow said:
Nunyobiznes: I just learned how to bold out phrases just recently, sorry about that... :p
Just busting balls. It seems like the Admins have had it kind of quiet around here for the last couple of days and we can't have them getting used to it.
:D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D
 
Nunyobiznes said:
Just busting balls. It seems like the Admins have had it kind of quiet around here for the last couple of days and we can't have them getting used to it.
:D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D
Yeah,I just love babysitting! Thanks buddy!:p
 

Laz

1
woody said:
Yeah,I just love babysitting! Thanks buddy!:p
Yep this is true, we love it.

I've even enclosed a pic of the last time we looked after kids:




Trouble is they just could not cope either! lol :D
 
Top