ok winamp it's old for me, but foobar.........read please:
- native support for many more formats out-of-the-box than winamp
- native and unified full-featured replaygain support (both scanning and setting gain values, and playback ability for many formats)
- ape2 tag support heavily emphasized
- tagz
- native and unified resampling/dither/24-bit output/kernel streaming output
- native high quality EQ
- mass tagger (upcoming version)
- album list (upcoming version)
- more robust playlist than winamp (offers more sorting and manipulation functionality, at least as far as what I can remember of winamp )
- better audio processing pipeline, including better handling of clipping, better dsp system, better volume control system, etc.
These are just a few things I could think of off the top of my head. There's a lot more to foobar being better than winamp other than it just being "new". Unlike most of the other players that get touted because of their "coolness" factor (/me thinks of coolplayer and deliplayer as being too examples in this thread), foobar2000 offers actual unique and excellent functionality in addition to just being damn cool :B
Oh.. and the 32-bit audio processing pipeline isn't there simply because it's "neat", it's actually a non-braindead way to design an audio player like this for once when you take into account all of the different things like dsp, volume control, etc.
Regards.
J.