Sorry to have sounded a little upset, but this complaining-moaning about DS has started getting to me. Nothing personal though.
Let's have some history:
People have been trying to modify DVDs while doing backups since day one. There are countless sites and threads in many forums for ways to do so. 99.9 % of the methods require moderate to expert ability to use Ifoedit, and the luxury for the users to have an ample amount of time on their hands. They also require the making of a lot of coasters, or, many DVD-RWs for testing. In the meantime, people have been asking for a tool that could automate things, even a little. Things started lightening up, when Menuedit started not being just a menuediting tool. But even then, it required manual user ifoedit input, which could lead to 'unwanted' results for newbies. Then DS appeared, aggreed under not the best of conditions, and instead of people being 100% supportive, many jumbed on it and it's authors. Is there a doubt that it's a 'black sheep' over at Doom9 forum? Every mention of it is monitored, and one prays he doesn't get on a Mod's bad side.
DS has constantly an ear out for user input, and almost al suggestions have been implemented, and then some. Every individual case with troubles is looked after. And it's on it's third public release, two of them betas! Now, do you know many commercial programs that do that?
The most sought after feature, was title selection, and it's already implemented.
EVERY transcoder has it's own unique way or operating, and it's idiosyncrasies. (since you keep comparing it to DVDShrink, which IMHO, is like comparing apples with oranges). I still remember a thread, where a guy wanted DVD2ONE to have the audio streams already checked when setting up the project, because he was too careless to check them manually, and ended up with no sound
Now THAT was a case of RTFM, if I ever saw one!
Now you keep complaining about Title selection, and MX has told you twice that it's ALREADY THERE, and you still complain about it.
Uhm, what else can he do?
The only thing that cannot be done is switch on the fly between DS and Shrink, but why would anyone want to do that? Even you say that you want it to 'see' what titles to get rid of. Isn't the cell preview within the title good enough? I'm sorry, you lost me here.
You say:
however I as a user still want a tool to help me instead of adapting my way of working to a tool. It would be perfectly nice if DS would allow me to do the ripping, but it's a nuisance that it forces me to. I would complain about e.g. DVDShrink the same way if ripping was not a feature but a must. Who wouldn't?
If DS was a transcoder, I would agree with you 100%. But it's not, so it's not comparable. It's a step before transcoding, to put it roughly. One would rip the DVD anyway. EVERY program forces you to rip. So it's done in a different way. What's the big deal? After DS is finished, you have a VIDEO_TS folder to preview any way you want. You can even use Shrink to preview from the DVD-Rom if you want, note what you don't want, then proceed with DS, get rid of stuff SAFELY AND EASY, and then open Shrink again. Is that 'adaptation' too much?
You say:
PLEASE consider support of files aready ripped to the HD and the use of the common numbering scheme before you add any new features that I don't really need. I still have a slight hope that DS might become the tool I waited for so long.
Part two is already answered, part one is a problem, agreed, BUT only if you already have files on your HD and have no means of re-ripping. But even then, you can always use IMGtools, make an image, mount it and then rip again the DS way. All in all, it's half an hour drawback, and problem solved.
Sorry about my raving, and don't take it personally, but your comments were the last straw for me. If I sounded offencive, I apologise to you and MackemX..
P.S.
Audio selection- removal is on the "to Do" list, but it's unknown if or when will be implemented. But I can live with that.
But then again, Shrink, which you praise so much, leaves all the audio streams "ghosts" in audio selection, a thing that bugs the hell out of me personally, especially with European DVDs with countless Audio and Sub streams. Don't get me wrong: Shrink has often got me out of impossible situations literally, but that doesn't make it 'immune' of improvement.