•   Notifications
  • Welcome to our forums

    Join us now to get access to all our awesome features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to create topics, post replies, give reputation to your fellow members, get your own private messenger, and so, so much more.

    + Reply to Thread + Post New Thread
    Results 1 to 5 of 5

    Thread: Palomino or Thoroughbred
  • Share This Thread!
    • Share on Facebook
    1. #1
      Join Date
      Nov 2001
      Location
      Scotland
      Posts
      26

      Palomino or Thoroughbred

      I'm about to upgrade my CPU the most my mobo can take is
      either an AMD Athlon XP CPU, 0.18 micron process Palomino up to 2100+ or 0.13 micron process Thoroughbred up to 2000+.
      the question is what one would be the best one to go for?
      cost difference isn't worth worrying about
      The thing that I don't understand is the 0.13 or 0.18 micron thing
      would the smaller die size be better (better=faster) or just go
      for the speed rating eg.2100+ rather than 2000+

      Any replies will be appreciated

      Thanks

    2. #2
      Join Date
      Nov 2001
      Location
      Mexico
      Posts
      478
      In my experience everytime that the micron size is reduced the processors have a speed increment even if they are rated at the same speed.

      Smaller die size heat less and have shorter connections.
      "No es la fe lo que salva sino el no tenerla (It is not faith what saves but not to have it)"
      - Antonio Plaza -

    3. #3
      Join Date
      Jul 2002
      Location
      Mauritius
      Posts
      1,859
      the Thoroughbred is supposed to be more performant than the palomino core
      for more details u can go and have a look at tomshardware

    4. #4
      Join Date
      Apr 2002
      Location
      uk
      Posts
      4,393
      Surprised it's restricted to a slower T-Bred than Palomino - that doesn't sound right.

      The T-Bred is probably a much better proposition for cooling, as it should certainly put out less heat than the Palomino core at a similar speed.

      The main reason for having a T-Bred, is that some 333 capable motherboards can unlock them automatically, allowing the immediate choice of raising the FSB from 266 to 333 (for ones that are not 333 already) and balancing it with a multiplier reduction.

      Can't remember which ones do this trick, or if it's limited to certain makes only or certain chipsets only.
      ¡uʍop ǝpısdn ɹoʇıuoɯ ʎɯ pǝuɹnʇ oɥʍ ¡ʎǝɥ

    5. #5
      Join Date
      Nov 2001
      Location
      Scotland
      Posts
      26
      Surprised it's restricted to a slower T-Bred than Palomino - that doesn't sound right.

      Made me double check but this is what it said on the mobo web site
      "Support AMD Athlon XP CPU, 0.18 micron process Palomino up to 2100+ and 0.13 micron process Thoroughbred up to 2000+"

      just updated the BIOS last week so it could take a faster CPU
      could only take 1800+xp until update
      Think I might go for the 2100+ just to push it over the 1.7GHz only running 1.2 Athlon at the moment If your thinking it isn't worth upgrading only 500GHz it's really a dual upgrade as my son's computer will get my 1.2 Athlon he's only running 800 Duron

      Thanks again


    Posting Permissions

    • You may not post new threads
    • You may not post replies
    • You may not post attachments
    • You may not edit your posts
    Powered by vBulletin™ Version 4.0.3 Copyright © 2012 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights