Yes, Netgear do have them, a little expensive though. If you look around there are others that do the same at half the price.
Join us now to get access to all our awesome features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to create topics, post replies, give reputation to your fellow members, get your own private messenger, and so, so much more.
I know this has nothing to do with the theme for this forum - but im sure there are dsl users out there - so if anyone got suggestions to make please post them, cheers
Basically trying to get dsl internet sharing re-done on my network.
and i just hate having to leave the main pc (connected to my *dumb* dsl modem) on all the time just so that the other pc and notebook can use the internet as well. Thats how its currently setup.
So I'm trying to stick a smart router or a box thats a hub/nat/firewall (i dont necessary need firewall) any suggestions on what to buy?
I know netgear got some similar products, not sure how goo they are.
Last edited by Shadey; 11-02-2002 at 16:18.
Yes, Netgear do have them, a little expensive though. If you look around there are others that do the same at half the price.
Houman - any particular manufacturer or model in mind ?
A good one here in Australia is "D-Link" DI-804 DSL/Cable Firewall Router. It cost $275 ( 90 Pounds).
Also 3Com (Can't remember the Model number - sorry ) about 100 pounds.
I am looking for the wireless Netgear MR314. ~359€
If you don´t need wireless then look for the:
D-Linkk/Neteasy DSL 4100~188€
W-Linx MB400S~163€
US Robotics Broadbandrouter~201€
Sorry but that´s all german online prices...and all in ugly Euro
All these suggestions are good, but if you want something that probs works better than those routers & you can probably get dirt cheap (if you don't already have the parts) is using a linux box as a router.
All you need is an old 486PC with 8MB of ram & a floppy drive with 2 NIC cards in it. Can't beat that can you. lol
I use one myself, & to help you out even more, here is the easiest way for you to do this:
h**p://www.bbiagent.net/en/***********
have fun.
I agree with you shadoe_Phantom. But when you really think about the work involved in :
1. Getting the Subcriber box (ADSL or Cable) connected to
2. 486 PC ( Desktop or Mini Tower )
3. Setup of Linux to act as a NAT and Proxy and Firewall
4. Having a second PC switched on everytime you want to access the internet on your LAN.
I would personally spend $150 and have a small good looking black box and save myself the headache.
ya you make a good point Houman, although the site I posted does all your configuration for you (a file you run & put onto just a floppy diskette)- no linux needed. It puts the linux you need in just a floppy diskette.
But ya, it is bulkey.
although personally I plan to make a nice compact 1 (or as compact as possible), by making a flat computer case/tower just big enough to fit in the mobo/cpu/floppy drive/vid card/both NIC cards. Shouldn't be any bigger than 12"x12"x4" (give or take an inch or so). Still a little bigger than a nice compact router, but you can always make it look as cool as you want (like case modding).
Just a suggestion if you already have those parts (old PC), otherwise if you have to spend the money, then by all means get a good router.
Sence cable has hit my area I get on the average of 2 3 phone call on the cost of setting up two our three computers on the same cable modem. I personaly run 3 networks with about 5 to 8 computers on each network. Iuse a switch because it ajust the band with better for me but if your only doing two to four a router is your best bet I use Dlink LINKSYS both are easy to set up run in to any problems dropme a line I'd be glad to help you out
I already brought the equipment i needed
I went for the Alcatel Speed Touch 510 (a newer model than the Speed Touch Pro with Firewall) with NAT/PAT/DHCP with single 10Mbps ethernet port. With that i got a Netgear FS105 10/100Mbps switch (autoport sensing).
I'm more than happy with the setup and how the gateway / modem / router is connected to the LAN. The netgear switch is brilliant - much better than using the Alcatel Speed Touch 510 with integrated 4 ethernet port 10mbps hub.
- - - - -
Only fustrating problem I have is configuing the router, I've oly got it running on the basic installation profiles. So its not configured to my liking. On top of that theres a lack of information on configuration, which doesnt help.
- - - - - - -
@shadoe_Phantom
i considered using that option - but it also meant leaving a pc on continously just so other pcs can connect, that was why i wasnt too keen on the idea . . .
I was aware of that linux firewall software thats self bootable from a floppy disk ! - I've been trying to get hold of it - but i forgot what it was called.
If you want to build a FLAT computer - i would consider a rack mount 2 inch high computer - though its much larger than a pizza hut LARGE (or even a US supreme sized - I bet they are enourmous in the states) pizza thoughthen again i dont know how big asian pizzas are
@ Master
already got my LAN wired up with ethernet cables running around the housebesides wireless LAN are a bit too expensive for me.
Cheers for the suggestions - i already checked out the D-Link 4100 - wasnt too keen on it.
@Houman
Thanks for your suggestions too mateI would prefer to go buy a little box with eveything in it - than fiddling around with a bulky 486
@rlb245
Cheers for the offer to help, I agree a switch in your case would be better, a hub would be too much hassle it'll end up flooding your network with packets and cause more collisions which woulnt help your networks. Thats why i decided on a switch too.
Maybe i should have considered Lynksys Router/switch, there seems to be too many things to configure on the 510. Its giving me a headache right now.
Last edited by Shadey; 24-02-2002 at 04:30.
Enjoy!
got my Netgear MR314 yesterday....it´s easy to configure and it´s working without problems.
But if you are looking for a good firewall then this Netgear shouldn´t be your choice.
Cool
Well the fiewall wasnt really necessary, just that i prefered the way the alcatel looked and the fact it was software upgradable.
But geez - the alcatel 510 isnt so easy to configure. I got the basic NAT with DHCP working on the lan - 3 computers sharing the single IP i have for the router. But cant setup the PAT up properly. The lack of literature is a bit of an upset.
I just got a standalone machine running SecurePiont a linex app. It was a real bitch to get set up becoase I don't no that much about linex but I'm trin to learn. I think I you can get an old 486 or better a dedicated machine is the best. The software is free at (linexapps.com) alot of nice linex stuff here check it out