•   Notifications
  • Welcome to our forums

    Join us now to get access to all our awesome features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to create topics, post replies, give reputation to your fellow members, get your own private messenger, and so, so much more.

    + Reply to Thread + Post New Thread
    Results 1 to 9 of 9

    Thread: BW and Daemon Tools
  • Share This Thread!
    • Share on Facebook
    1. #1
      Join Date
      Feb 2002
      Location
      The guardhouse at Bangla's mansion!
      Posts
      170

      BW and Daemon Tools

      checked out image writing with BW (v4.2.5, wrote a standard ISO of MSDN CD2 V6) and tried loading it with Daemon Tools 323, and got an error. I checked the FAQs -- nothing on loading errors there for my drives.
      I tried creating another ISO with ISOBuster (using the same source disc) and it came out okay.
      ?????

    2. #2
      Join Date
      Feb 2002
      Location
      The guardhouse at Bangla's mansion!
      Posts
      170
      followup:
      i tried the BW 4.25 and Daemon Tools 3.20 combination -- that one worked.
      Let me add a "HUH???" to that last post I made, then.

    3. #3
      Join Date
      Sep 2001
      Location
      Canada
      Posts
      7,823
      Maybe the first image contained an error(bad read).Not sure?It happens.

    4. #4
      Join Date
      Feb 2002
      Location
      The guardhouse at Bangla's mansion!
      Posts
      170
      @woody:
      thanx for the suggestion.
      i rechecked image integrity, and made a second copy under a different filename. with the first combination, it didn't work again. second combination wotked without a problem, though.
      i've since installed Daemon Tools 3.26 -- that one works too. Seems like the problem was d-tools 3.23 after all.
      just like the church lady from the old SNL days, "...must be the devil..."

    5. #5
      Join Date
      Sep 2001
      Location
      Canada
      Posts
      7,823
      LOL!!Yeah software has been known to be buggy too...Nero is a good example.

    6. #6
      Join Date
      Feb 2002
      Location
      The guardhouse at Bangla's mansion!
      Posts
      170
      hahaha, buggy for Nero (at least 556x) is an understatement. Denexo would disagree, though. A recent thread ("For Those who hate Nero") came out quite hilarious, and it included references to Depends underpants and defragging while burning.
      Hey, thanks again for the suggestion. It really helped point the finger at the daemon, er, devil.

    7. #7
      Join Date
      Jun 2002
      Location
      Bangladesh
      Posts
      178
      Originally posted by kugmo
      hahaha, buggy for Nero (at least 556x) is an understatement.
      what is yr problem with nero ? lemme guess, refused job application ?

    8. #8
      Join Date
      Feb 2002
      Location
      The guardhouse at Bangla's mansion!
      Posts
      170
      no. Ahead boss would not sit on my lap. didn't like the third leg. Ashampoo boss was better.

    9. #9
      Join Date
      Jun 2002
      Location
      Bangladesh
      Posts
      178
      lol, as always


    Posting Permissions

    • You may not post new threads
    • You may not post replies
    • You may not post attachments
    • You may not edit your posts
    Powered by vBulletin™ Version 4.0.3 Copyright © 2012 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights