followup:
i tried the BW 4.25 and Daemon Tools 3.20 combination -- that one worked.
Let me add a "HUH???" to that last post I made, then.
Join us now to get access to all our awesome features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to create topics, post replies, give reputation to your fellow members, get your own private messenger, and so, so much more.
checked out image writing with BW (v4.2.5, wrote a standard ISO of MSDN CD2 V6) and tried loading it with Daemon Tools 323, and got an error. I checked the FAQs -- nothing on loading errors there for my drives.
I tried creating another ISO with ISOBuster (using the same source disc) and it came out okay.
?????
followup:
i tried the BW 4.25 and Daemon Tools 3.20 combination -- that one worked.
Let me add a "HUH???" to that last post I made, then.
Maybe the first image contained an error(bad read).Not sure?It happens.![]()
@woody:
thanx for the suggestion.
i rechecked image integrity, and made a second copy under a different filename. with the first combination, it didn't work again. second combination wotked without a problem, though.
i've since installed Daemon Tools 3.26 -- that one works too. Seems like the problem was d-tools 3.23 after all.
just like the church lady from the old SNL days, "...must be the devil..."![]()
LOL!!Yeah software has been known to be buggy too...Nero is a good example.![]()
hahaha, buggy for Nero (at least 556x) is an understatement.Denexo would disagree, though. A recent thread ("For Those who hate Nero") came out quite hilarious, and it included references to Depends underpants and defragging while burning.
Hey, thanks again for the suggestion. It really helped point the finger at the daemon, er, devil.![]()
what is yr problem with nero ? lemme guess, refused job application ?Originally posted by kugmo
hahaha, buggy for Nero (at least 556x) is an understatement.![]()
![]()
no. Ahead boss would not sit on my lap. didn't like the third leg. Ashampoo boss was better.![]()
lol, as always