•   Notifications
  • Welcome to our forums

    Join us now to get access to all our awesome features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to create topics, post replies, give reputation to your fellow members, get your own private messenger, and so, so much more.

    + Reply to Thread + Post New Thread
    Results 1 to 12 of 12

    Thread: HD cluster size for recording?
  • Share This Thread!
    • Share on Facebook
    1. #1

      HD cluster size for recording?

      What is the best partition cluster size for speeding up Harddisk recording, or is there no difference?

    2. #2
      Join Date
      Nov 2001
      Location
      Around the world...
      Posts
      5,003
      Hi it's down to your PC system and what your recording to your harddrive. Are you getting problems with something your doing?
      Tanx You!



      My wife is so "Beautiful"...She only shaves her face twice a day!!
      ... Quote by Rastabt

    3. #3
      i think FAT32 32K clusters will give you optimium performance for hard disc recording regardless of your system.

    4. #4
      Join Date
      Apr 2002
      Location
      Argentina
      Posts
      387
      And I can't complain about my FAT32 4K clusters performance either. If you have a fast system/hard disk it doesn't matters I think.
      The three steps to happyness:
      1. Read the rules
      2. Use the search
      3. Enjoy your stay

      AMD Athlon XP 2000+, ASUS A7V333, 256MB DDR-SDRAM PC2100, ASUS V9180 TD GeForce4 MX 440 AGP 8x,
      LG GCE-8160B 16x10x40x CD-RW, Pioneer DVD-ROM DVD-117, SB Live! MP3+, Windows 2000 SP2.

    5. #5
      I think Fat32 is faster for audio regording on hard disk, and ntfs for video recording. That is from my personal experience.

    6. #6
      I'm using a Audio harddisk-recording system with 12 or more mono/stereo tracks, this must be stressfull for any harddisk or not? Because of reading and writing simultanious a lot of files.

    7. #7
      12 tracks is nothing! You don't need to worry so much about h/d performance if that's all you are looking for.

      about the fat32 4k clusters. While you will certainly use a lot of tracks with this setup, 32k clusters will produce less hard drive stress on multiple tracks. i wouldn't argue it's essential that convert to 32k clusters but it's certainly beneficial long term and your drive will defragment faster (larger cluster sizes defragment quicker). it will also waste less disk space for larger files.

    8. #8
      Join Date
      Aug 2002
      Location
      Planet you call MARS
      Posts
      37
      NTFS is better for larg files

      just keep the partition under 8GB and u will have a fast cluster under NTFS

      sundrak@zonnet.nl
      www.sundrak.tk

    9. #9
      Can i use (format) a NTFS partition under Win98se?

    10. #10
      Join Date
      Aug 2002
      Location
      Planet you call MARS
      Posts
      37
      no u cant
      only thing that is posible (with software) is to read from a NTFS partition....

      sundrak@zonnet.nl
      www.sundrak.tk

    11. #11
      You can not format, but you certainly CAN use it (software from Winternals called ntfs for win98)

      sebus

    12. #12
      Can someone reccomend a a program for changing FAT32 cluster sizes (possibly freeware)? I know Partition Magic does it, but I have some major gripes with that program. I'm looking for something much smaller anyways. Thanx!


    Posting Permissions

    • You may not post new threads
    • You may not post replies
    • You may not post attachments
    • You may not edit your posts
    Powered by vBulletin™ Version 4.0.3 Copyright © 2012 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights